Vinod Balap vs Smt. Chhaya (Bombay HC) (2003 BomCR Cri, I (2003) DMC 580, 2002 (4) MhLj 937)
3. It appears that on the application, on 29-2-2002 the Court passed an order asking the other side to say. On 5-3-2002 the Court passed the further order that there was no say filed by the other side and hence the matter was directed to be put up for orders. An endorsement on the said application reveals that the applicant-husband received the copy of that application on 28-3-2002. However, on 28-3-2002 itself, the trial court allowed the said application and struck of the defence of the respondent. In fact, the record indicates that on 28-3-2002 the applicant had deposited Rs. 4,000/- which were the arrears for five months, in the Court.
4. The contention of the applicant that there is no provision under Section 125, Criminal Procedure Code to strike out the defence. If any person fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order and only thing that can be under Section 125(3) is to issue warrant for levying the amount due in the manner provided for levying fines or for imprisonment as provided for in the said Sub-clause (3) of Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code.
5. The submission made on behalf of the applicant that there is no legal provision under Section 125, Criminal Procedure Code and hence there is no power in the Family Court to strike out the defence for non payment of interim maintenance is agreed to be a legal position. The Family Court is governed by the Family Courts Act. The procedure is to be followed by the Court under the said Act is as laid down under Section 10, which is as follows :
10. Procedure generally. -- (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and of any other law for the time being in force shall apply to the suits and proceedings (other than the proceedings under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) before a Family Court and for the purposes of the said provisions of the Code, a Family Court shall be deemed to be a civil court and shall have all the powers of such court.
(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or the rules made thereunder, shall apply to the proceedings under Chapter IX of that Code before a Family Court.
(3) Nothing in Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) shall prevent a Family Court from laying down its own procedure with a view to arrive at a settlement in respect of the subject matter of the suit or proceedings or at the truth of the facts alleged by one Party and denied by the other.
6. It may be seen from the above that insofar as an application for maintenance under Section 125, Criminal Procedure Code, the same falls under Chapter IX of the Criminal Procedure Code and hence Civil Procedure Code has no application and the proceedings would be governed by the Court by Criminal Procedure,
9. The application under Section 125, Criminal Procedure Code will proceed expeditiously and in view of the rule being made absolute, the defence of the applicant-husband will be taken into account.