Anita v. Rati Ram Chauhan : 2012 (2) Crimes 165 : 2011 (3) DMC 791 : 2012 (1) RCR (Crl) 575 : 2011 (9) AD (Del) 619 : 2011 (4) JCC 2755 : 2012 MLR 238 : 2011 (184) DLT 407 (Del) : 2011 LRC Online 877 (Del)
Section 125-Dismissal of application-Revision-Petitioner has not been able to adduce any evidence to support her contention of being neglected by respondent-No explanation rendered by petitioner as to why she did not inform her neighbour or any other person who allegedly removed or any other person who allegedly removed her to the nursing home that she was thrown by respondent or his father-Criminal complaint under IPC was filed by petitioner after about 17-20 months of the other incident shows that same was an afterthought-Respondent on the other hand has adduced evidence to show is paying rupees three thousand per month regularly as directed by Additional District Judge-No infirmity in impugned order-Petition dismissed.
Held : The Petitioner has not been able to adduce any evidence to support her contention of being neglected by the Respondent. Moreover there is no explanation rendered by the Petitioner as to why she did not inform her neighbour or any other person who allegedly removed her to the nursing home that she was thrown by the Respondent or his father. Further the fact that the Complaint under Sections 498A, 406, 307 & 34 IPC was filed by the Petitioner after about 17-20 months of the incident shows that the same was an after thought. The Respondent on the other hand has adduced evidence to show that he had not neglected to maintain the Petitioner and is even paying Rs. 3,000/- per month regularly as directed by the learned Additional District Judge.